View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
airzonk81 Member

Joined: 04 Apr 2005 Posts: 38 Location: Oakland, California, US
|
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 1:04 am Post subject: WinXP on intel macs (dualboot) + magicengine anyone..? |
|
|
So I'm now even more convinced my next computer will be a MacBook Pro, now that there is an official way to dual-boot Windows (believe it or not, one oh my main reasons for keeping a PC as my primary desktop is for MagicEngine)...
Has anyone booted into WinXP using Apple's new BootCamp software, and if so, how does ME perform? As well as I'd expect...? =]
DaemonTools working well, etc etc...?
Looking forward to hearing your experiences...
I'm hoping there will be a VMware-style virtualization product for Mac OS X which will allow booting another OS from *within* Mac OS X....without the peformance penalty of having to emulate the x86 architecture, this time.
Happy Gaming,
Gabe |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tomaitheous Elder

Joined: 27 Sep 2005 Posts: 306 Location: Tucson
|
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 2:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
I haven't been keeping up on the Mac side of things lately, but even if you have an x86 processor, don't you still need to emulate the south/north bride and other hardware that's PC specific? _________________ www.pcedev.net |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
airzonk81 Member

Joined: 04 Apr 2005 Posts: 38 Location: Oakland, California, US
|
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2006 6:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Correct me if I'm wrong; but the only significant difference between the intel Macs and a standard-issue PC is the use of EFI instead of a traditional PC BIOS. There are probably a lot of other subtle things but basically it's a PC--all standard issue PC components, including graphics, sound, I/O, etc. chipsets...
BootCamp (as I understand) basically just provides intel Mac owners with a mechanism to burn all the appropriate drivers to a disc which can be used at install time, and preps EFI to emulate a standard PC BIOs for windows, or maybe apple uses a licensed bios(?)
Can't wait to get my hands on one of these myself...
-G |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Jabberwok Elder

Joined: 24 Apr 2002 Posts: 532 Location: Quebec, Canada
|
Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 3:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
But, if these new Macs can run Windows then why pay the "Apple premium price"? just stick with what works  _________________ If you translate Pole Position in French with babelfish you get 'Position de Polonais'... I think it's hilarious... from a French point of view. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Tomaitheous Elder

Joined: 27 Sep 2005 Posts: 306 Location: Tucson
|
Posted: Wed Apr 12, 2006 4:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
The only reason I still need a Mac OS is for Final Cut pro 4. Are they going to release a PC compatible version of Mac OS along side the Apple intel-box version? _________________ www.pcedev.net |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
r0ni Member

Joined: 03 Oct 2005 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Slightly off-topic but ME does run full speed through Virtual PC 7 on a ppc OSX machine.
While, a native release would be nice, I keep VPC7 installed with win98 to use a few windows apps I no longer have access to on OSX and I was very surprised to see how well ME ran on it.
Since the release of Boot Camp and Apple's switch to x86, I wonder if this will speed up or put an end to the OSX version of ME? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rolins Visitor

Joined: 21 May 2005 Posts: 15 Location: California
|
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 4:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well, you could also use Mednafen. It runs natively on OSX and it's darn fast. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|