View previous topic :: View next topic |
hi-res or normal? |
hi-res |
|
40% |
[ 4 ] |
normal |
|
60% |
[ 6 ] |
|
Total Votes : 10 |
|
Author |
Message |
masvil Visitor

Joined: 16 Feb 2005 Posts: 10
|
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:01 pm Post subject: Hi-res or not? |
|
|
Do you play with hi-res or normal?
Why? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Keranu Elder

Joined: 05 Aug 2002 Posts: 669 Location: Neo Geo Land
|
Posted: Mon Apr 17, 2006 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Normal, I like having a fixed size. _________________ LaZer Dorks |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rolins Visitor

Joined: 21 May 2005 Posts: 15 Location: California
|
Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 4:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Normal 'cause my pc is too slow for hi-res |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
mykie Visitor

Joined: 20 Apr 2006 Posts: 3 Location: Seattle, WA
|
Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 7:31 pm Post subject: Normal... |
|
|
...because I don't like blurry interpolated game screens where some of the detail is averaged out, and other details look OVER averaged. I prefer to see every pixel as a square as God intended.
Many emulator authors, imho, waste too much time creating filters and plugins when the original, unfettered image is what I want to see. Take for instance Visual Boy Advance, a fine emulator, but all too choppy under software-drawing mode. In order to get around this, you have to enable hardware acceleration, which includes (without any apparent way around it) applying some crazy visual filter, which interferes greatly with the viewing of the original video output.
</rant>
Thank goodness David had a fabulous emulator core for the Magic Engine long before the fancy GUI and other features were introduced. Long live ME! _________________ Never argue with an idiot; they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kaminari Elder

Joined: 19 Apr 2002 Posts: 1432 Location: Paris, France
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|